Two recent incidents, in the Middle East, should give western anti-terrorism strategists something to ponder.
A bus crash in Egypt, last Wednesday, killed six and left 27 others seriously injured. This incident would have gone unnoticed except that some Australian police and paramedics were among the victims.
A report in the Sydney Morning Herald – Carnage on wheels worse than terrorism – makes a fascinating point:
The deaths of six Australian tourists in a bus crash is not a big story in Egypt.
Terrorist attacks on the Sinai tourist resorts of Taba and Sharm el Sheikh in October 2004 and August 2005 killed at least 100 people, many of them foreign visitors.
In 1997 Islamic fundamentalist gunmen murdered 57 mainly Western visitors at Luxor, an attack from which Egypt's vital tourist industry has struggled to redeem itself.
Terrorist attacks, for all their headline-grabbing horror, are a minor cause of death compared with the carnage on the roads, which claimed 6000 lives in 27,000 accidents in 2002, according to the Egyptian National Council for Road Safety's figures.
Hajj Deaths
Over in Saudi Arabia at the scene of the Hajj in Mecca, a Red Crescent doctor at the scene, put the number of injured at 1000 in a stampede there. At least 345 people were killed.The stampede took place at the foot of the Jamarat Bridge in Mina, near Mecca, where hundreds of thousands had flocked to pelt stones at symbols of the devil to purge themselves of sin. Saudi Arabia.
Briton’s Guardian Unlimited reports: Some 3,000 people have died in incidents at the hajj in the last 20 years in stampedes, demonstrations, and fires at pilgrim camping areas and one person was killed when a bomb exploded near Mecca's Grand Mosque in 1989.
The worst incident in modern times was in 1990 when a stampede at a tunnel in Mecca killed 1,426 pilgrims, many of them Malaysians, Indonesian and Pakistanis. The pilgrims were killed in in an overcrowded pedestrian tunnel leading to the holy sites in Mecca, where pilgrims go through a series of rituals on the hajj and travel from all over the world to attend.
Previous disasters in recent years include:
February 1 2004 244 pilgrims killed and a similar number injured at al-Jamarat
March 5 2001 35 people killed in stampede at al-Jamarat
April 9 1998 Around 180 pilgrims trampled to death when panic erupted after several fell off an overpass at al-Jamarat
April 15 1997 Fires driven by high winds tear through a sprawling, overcrowded tent city at Mina, trapping and killing more than 340 pilgrims and injuring 1,500
May 23 1994 270 pilgrims, most of them Indonesian, killed at al-Jamarat
July 2 1990 1,426 pilgrims, many of them Malaysians, Indonesian and Pakistanis, killed in stampede in overcrowded pedestrian tunnel leading to holy sites in Mecca in the worst hajj tragedy of modern times
July 9 1989 Two bombs explode in Mecca, killing one pilgrim, and wounding 16 others. Saudi authorities blame Iranian-inspired terrorists and later behead 16 Kuwaiti Shia Muslims for bombings. Iran denied involvement.
July 31 1987 402 people, mostly Iranian pilgrims, killed and 649 wounded in Mecca when security forces clash with Iranians staging illegal anti-US demonstration.
There is, no doubt, some sound academic reasoning for, what might seem to us, a poor regard for human life.
The Sydney Morning Herald journalist reported:
A local Egyptian watched in fascination as an Australian media team took close-up photographs of the twisted metal and human debris, and paced out the distance from the wreck to the bend where the fatal skid developed.
"Did they really come all this way just because six people died in a bus crash?" he asked their translator. "Yes," she replied, "because Australian people care about their lives."
A ‘Google news’ search for Hajj threw a many non-stories along the lines of – No (insert country here) killed in Hajj Stampede.
Perhaps western strategists are missing a vital point in their assault terrorism. It is obviously not a case of comparing ‘apples with apples’. The enemy is not ordinary people of any race, most of who mourn their individual dead as we do.
Leaderships, whether of countries like the supposedly allied Saudi Arabia or even antagonist countries in the region; leaderships of ‘movements’ often no bigger than a handful a fanatics, simply do not count human life in the way we do.
That, for all the Bush bluster about ‘emboldening’ the enemy, is our real ‘Achilles’ heel.’ We will continue to care and in the process provide fanatics with their greatest weapon, our tears and fears. In the process, Governments of the ‘War on Terrorism’ coalition will continue to give their enemy success after success.
Introducing the Mystic Simone Weil.
6 days ago
4 comments:
I think you mistake a belief in acts of God/Allah/Y*W*H for not caring about human life.
Islam takes death as a fact of life: you get born, you live, you die. The only place you have real authority is in the middle part. You don't decide when you'll be born and--according to Muslims--there's not much you can do about picking your time of death, either.
It's called "fatalism" and really shouldn't be misunderstood as not caring. People of all religions, and none, do care about what happens to others in a descending priority list, with more concern being shown to those closest to them.
But dying while on pilgrimage isn't a bad thing in itself, as one who dies while doing Haj is seen as getting a straight shot at the pearly gates, do not pass Go, do collect all sorts of good things on the way.
The task of handling over two million people, all going to the same place at the same time, is formidible. It's like handling the crowd control for 40 simultaneous Super Bowl games, all being held in the same stadium. Oh, and the crowd speaks nearly 100 different languages and half of them are illiterate.
Even though the pillars at Mina were "improved" this year, the problems of the crowds didn't get fixed. Perhaps next year?
You could well be right, in so far as I cannot conceive a vengeful, interventionist God/Allah/Y*W*H et al.
Your second assertion is true for all of us, but does not automatically imply fatalism. We all have free will and the obligation to take responsibility for the consequences of our actions.
The truth is, I cannot accept the concept of ‘acts of God’ as anything more than personal cop out or weak justification.
If I implied that individuals do not care about life I missed my mark. Surely an Iraqi is as capable of morning the death of a close one as anyone else. The difference, I would assert, is at the wider social level, removed from the personal pain.
As to addressing the problem of the Hajj, sadly history would suggest that the human sacrifice will continue.
Like all despotic rulers of the Middle Eastern region over the millennia, the Saudi Royal family will do nothing which might stir adverse reactions from the priests.
Perhaps the root of the fatalism you speak of is a people squeezed between the despots and the priests. I dare say there would be little personal choice in that situation.
Let me add to hatcher's description of the crowd at the hajj, that all the people there know about the deaths in the past, so they are "skittish and ready to run at the first sign of trouble. Thus amplifying the panic.
Mike
Thanks fast rider. I appreciate your comment.
Post a Comment