One vote one value,
that should be the primary aim of our voting systems.
I love voting systems, especially the systems designed to
reflect real voter preference; like the majority of the wide variety of
Australian models across the federal and state administrations. We have
straight single member preferential voting and variations of multi-member
proportional representation.
On the face of it, they all provide the real choice of the
voters to one extent or another, or would if they weren’t tinkered with
constantly in attempts to favour the major parties. Each time they try to control outcomes the
systems simply become more warped.
Look at the sample ballot (below) for the Victorian
Legislative Council (Upper House). Because of the generally large number of
candidates vying to fill these multi-member electorates Victorian politician
have actually managed to provide three different methods of voting, most
devaluing the intention of the base method:
·
Number all the boxes, (exhaustive preferential)
in the example that is 1 to 38 in your order of preference. This is the most
pure method, as long as the voter can garner enough information of the large
number of candidate to make an informed choice.
·
Just vote one box above the line. Dinky this
one, so simple to allow your vote to be skewed in ways you never intended. The
parties and candidate make all your choices for you, to suit their own agendas.
·
Limited preferential, number a minimum of five
of the boxes; meaning preferences are exhausted at the number the voter chooses
to stop at after their mandatory five. It also stops preferences accidentally
leaking to candidates the voter doesn’t want to support.
Personally I see the Victorian system as a unrepresentative
pig’s breakfast. Far fairer would be to dump the ‘above the line’ and impose a
minimum (in these 5 member electorates) of numbering ten boxes. Surely finding
information on ten preferred candidates is not too onerous and ensures a
reasonable preferences option before the vote is exhausted. But then the
simpler system doesn’t benefit the big parties so we can forget that one.
